<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Ideas for OpenNeuro</title>
  <subtitle>Ideas for OpenNeuro as submitted to our Feature Upvote board. Ideas are ordered by 'new' and the 50 top matches are included.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com"/>
  <id>pr_ln3gwmugyhayf6a</id>
  <updated>2023-04-04T10:11:53Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Add advanced search option</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/201142/add-advanced-search-option"/>
    <id>sug_mcttsy5osvz76dc</id>
    <published>2021-08-02T12:38:53Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T12:40:29Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">It would be very convenient if one could search within fields (Files, Size, Subjects, Sessions, Available Tasks, Available Modalities) or at least filter by a specific MRI brain imaging modality (rs-fMRI, task-fMRI, DWI, T1w, etc.). Boolean operators would be a great thing to have too.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>sorting by neuroimaging methodology and task</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/55590/sorting-by-neuroimaging-methodology-and-task"/>
    <id>sug_g0ckdoxi4mdgoia</id>
    <published>2019-09-05T12:59:17Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:28:53Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">Include an additional field to sort by neuroimaging methodologies (e.g. fMRI, EEG, MEG, sMRI, DTI, fNIRS, TMS etc). Include another field to allow sorting by task. Allow users to sort by multiple fields at once (e.g. neuroimaging methodology and task).</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Add delete option for directories on the web interface</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/45723/add-delete-option-for-directories-on-the-web-interface"/>
    <id>sug_l00svfh6pa5b9ng</id>
    <published>2019-06-25T15:06:08Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:25:56Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">When editing datasets using the web interface, it would be more convienent to allow users to directly delete a certain directory instead of clicking the delete button file by file, especially for the case of directories concaining lot of files.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Aggregate various bids datasets under a single project</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/40762/aggregate-various-bids-datasets-under-a-single-project"/>
    <id>sug_o5iad2n2fdjrjjq</id>
    <published>2019-05-06T18:31:40Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:24:37Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">It would be nice to be able to aggregate various bids datasets (one study including multiple datasets with different subjects) under a single project.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Provide a link to the read-only version of private datasets</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/37711/provide-a-link-to-the-readonly-version-of-private-datasets"/>
    <id>sug_ab71oc5ztupzfsv</id>
    <published>2019-04-09T16:26:01Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:23:36Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">The current setup make it difficult for reviewers to anonymously access private datasets. Either the author of the data paper needs to share their login info (which is a bad practice and essentially impossible with the required gmail authentication) or add the email address of the reviewer to the dataset, which removes anonymity. &#13;
&#13;
To get around this issue, is it possible to provide a shareable link to private datasets for this purpose (e.g., like on NeuroVault)?</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>how do I run fmriprep (beginner question)?</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/37285/how-do-i-run-fmriprep-beginner-question"/>
    <id>sug_v0u2oae3hc2a4vl</id>
    <published>2019-04-05T05:04:49Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:23:28Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">How do you run fmriprep on open neuro?</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Replace email address with name in the comment</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/36283/replace-email-address-with-name-in-the-comment"/>
    <id>sug_0wnfi5dwfmxcuep</id>
    <published>2019-03-27T17:41:51Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:23:14Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">When signing up with a google account:&#13;
- Creating a dataset shows at the top of the dataset page the name of the user&#13;
- Posting a comment shows the email address instead&#13;
&#13;
And there is no option anywhere to hide the email address. What if I don't want my email address to appear there?&#13;
&#13;
Example:&#13;
https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds001779#comment-5c9bb1ca963d603947563f3b</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Link to previous screen from the file-viewer</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/27361/link-to-previous-screen-from-the-fileviewer"/>
    <id>sug_bocjwvvtimkiipg</id>
    <published>2019-01-13T14:29:40Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:19:01Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">When viewing a file in a dataset, there's no easy way to go back to the previous view, with the file list expanded to the same place. (Or if there is, what to click is not obvious.) This would make browsing the dataset or walking through reports much more natural.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Collect user likes/stars in "Liked datasets" page</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/27307/collect-user-likesstars-in-liked-datasets-page"/>
    <id>sug_li5jlrwrht1sydr</id>
    <published>2019-01-12T15:51:24Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:19:00Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">I would like to be able to quickly access the datasets I've liked in a "Liked datasets" page that I could access through my profile.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Automatic tagging of data with schema.org Dataset</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/19757/automatic-tagging-of-data-with-schemaorg-dataset"/>
    <id>sug_zk0p15fvgxqwlos</id>
    <published>2018-10-21T09:26:56Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:15:49Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">For Google Dataset Search indexing!</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Automated extraction of parcellation time series</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/19511/automated-extraction-of-parcellation-time-series"/>
    <id>sug_tmyhmtsmtudgcwb</id>
    <published>2018-10-18T19:06:58Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:15:31Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">Following preprocessing of functional scans (eg rest, task, movie), data could be extracted from a set of user-defined parcels (eg by calculating the mean value within each voxel from a parcellation) and stored as a .tsv file. This would make sharing of data much easier, due to smaller file size, and also represents a major rate limiting step for functional analysis of temporal data. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Run quality control pipeline for every new dataset</title>
    <link href="https://openneuro.featureupvote.com/suggestions/19433/run-quality-control-pipeline-for-every-new-dataset"/>
    <id>sug_jxzbwmykon2wury</id>
    <published>2018-10-18T06:50:28Z</published>
    <updated>2023-03-03T11:15:30Z</updated>
    <content type="text/plain">Automatically run and expose the result of a quality control pipeline such as http://mriqc.org on every new dataset or new snapshot of a dataset.</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
